Excludes1 pair

O71.6 vs S33-

O71.6 and S33 are not coded together. ICD-10-CM declares them mutually exclusive with an Excludes1 note — the two conditions are not expected to occur together, so exactly one of them is normally correct for a given encounter. The Official Guidelines carve out one exception: if the two conditions are clearly unrelated to each other, both may be reported.

The official note, declared on S33
obstetric damage to pelvic joints and ligaments (O71.6)
O71.6

Obstetric damage to pelvic joints and ligaments

Billable
Chapter 15
Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium
Section
O60-O77
Use when the record says
  • Obstetric avulsion of inner symphyseal cartilage
  • Obstetric damage to coccyx
  • Obstetric traumatic separation of symphysis (pubis)
Indexed under
  • Avulsion › symphyseal cartilage, complicating delivery (inner)
  • Damage › coccyx, complicating delivery
  • Separation › pubic bone, obstetrical trauma
  • Separation › symphysis pubis, obstetrical trauma
  • Avulsion › cartilage › symphyseal, complicating delivery (inner)
S33

Dislocation and sprain of joints and ligaments of lumbar spine and pelvis

Not billable
Chapter 19
Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes
Section
S30-S39
Use when the record says
  • avulsion of joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • laceration of cartilage, joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • sprain of cartilage, joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • traumatic hemarthrosis of joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • traumatic rupture of joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • traumatic subluxation of joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis
  • traumatic tear of joint or ligament of lumbar spine and pelvis

These two codes sit in different chapters of the Tabular List, which is usually the clearest signal that they describe different underlying processes rather than different degrees of the same one.

Excludes1 is not always absolute: where two conditions covered by the note are genuinely unrelated, CMS guidance permits reporting both. Document the reasoning rather than assuming it. More on Excludes1 vs Excludes2 · FY2027