F06.7 vs R41.4
F06.7 and R41.4 can never be reported together. ICD-10-CM declares them mutually exclusive with an Excludes1 note, meaning the two conditions cannot occur in the same patient — so exactly one of them is correct for any given encounter.
The official note, declared on F06.7
neurologic neglect syndrome (R41.4)
F06.7
Mild neurocognitive disorder due to known physiological condition
Not billable
- Chapter 5
- Mental, Behavioral and Neurodevelopmental disorders
- Section
- F01-F09
Use when the record says
- Mild neurocognitive impairment due to a known physiological condition
R41.4
Neurologic neglect syndrome
Billable
- Chapter 18
- Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified
- Section
- R40-R46
Use when the record says
- Asomatognosia
- Hemi-akinesia
- Hemi-inattention
- Hemispatial neglect
- Left-sided neglect
- Sensory neglect
- Visuospatial neglect
Indexed under
- Asomatognosia
- Hemi-akinesia
- Hemi-inattention
- Neglect › hemispatial
- Neglect › left-sided
These two codes sit in different chapters of the Tabular List, which is usually the clearest signal that they describe different underlying processes rather than different degrees of the same one.
Excludes1 is not always absolute: where two conditions covered by the note are genuinely unrelated, CMS guidance permits reporting both. Document the reasoning rather than assuming it. More on Excludes1 vs Excludes2 · FY2027