E31 vs G11.3
E31 and G11.3 can never be reported together. ICD-10-CM declares them mutually exclusive with an Excludes1 note, meaning the two conditions cannot occur in the same patient — so exactly one of them is correct for any given encounter.
The official note, declared on E31
ataxia telangiectasia [Louis-Bar] (G11.3)
E31
Polyglandular dysfunction
Not billable
- Chapter 4
- Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases
- Section
- E20-E35
G11.3
Cerebellar ataxia with defective DNA repair
Billable
- Chapter 6
- Diseases of the nervous system
- Section
- G10-G14
Use when the record says
- Ataxia telangiectasia [Louis-Bar]
Indexed under
- Ataxia-telangiectasia (Louis-Bar)
- Boder-Sedgwick syndrome (ataxia-telangiectasia)
- Louis-Bar syndrome (ataxia-telangiectasia)
- Ataxia, ataxy, ataxic › telangiectasia
- Syndrome › ataxia-telangiectasia
These two codes sit in different chapters of the Tabular List, which is usually the clearest signal that they describe different underlying processes rather than different degrees of the same one.
Excludes1 is not always absolute: where two conditions covered by the note are genuinely unrelated, CMS guidance permits reporting both. Document the reasoning rather than assuming it. More on Excludes1 vs Excludes2 · FY2027