Excludes1 pair

D69.0 vs L95-

D69.0 and L95 are not coded together. ICD-10-CM declares them mutually exclusive with an Excludes1 note — the two conditions are not expected to occur together, so exactly one of them is normally correct for a given encounter. The Official Guidelines carve out one exception: if the two conditions are clearly unrelated to each other, both may be reported.

The official note, declared on L95
Henoch(-Schönlein) purpura (D69.0)
D69.0

Allergic purpura

Billable
Chapter 3
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism
Section
D65-D69
Use when the record says
  • Allergic vasculitis
  • Nonthrombocytopenic hemorrhagic purpura
  • Nonthrombocytopenic idiopathic purpura
  • Purpura anaphylactoid
  • Purpura Henoch(-Schönlein)
  • Purpura rheumatica
  • Vascular purpura
Indexed under
  • Henoch (-Schönlein) disease or syndrome (purpura)
  • Peliosis (rheumatica)
  • Schönlein (-Henoch) disease or purpura (primary) (rheumatic)
  • Allergy, allergic › purpura
  • Anaphylactic › purpura
L95

Vasculitis limited to skin, not elsewhere classified

Not billable
Chapter 12
Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue
Section
L80-L99

These two codes sit in different chapters of the Tabular List, which is usually the clearest signal that they describe different underlying processes rather than different degrees of the same one.

Excludes1 is not always absolute: where two conditions covered by the note are genuinely unrelated, CMS guidance permits reporting both. Document the reasoning rather than assuming it. More on Excludes1 vs Excludes2 · FY2027