A06.4 vs K75.0
A06.4 and K75.0 are not coded together. ICD-10-CM declares them mutually exclusive with an Excludes1 note — the two conditions are not expected to occur together, so exactly one of them is normally correct for a given encounter. The Official Guidelines carve out one exception: if the two conditions are clearly unrelated to each other, both may be reported.
Amebic liver abscess
- Chapter 1
- Certain infectious and parasitic diseases
- Section
- A00-A09
- Hepatic amebiasis
- Abscess › amebic
- Ameba, amebic › abscess (liver)
- Dysentery, dysenteric › abscess, liver
- Abscess › amebic › liver (without mention of brain or lung abscess)
- Abscess › hepatic › amebic
Abscess of liver
- Chapter 11
- Diseases of the digestive system
- Section
- K70-K77
- Cholangitic hepatic abscess
- Hematogenic hepatic abscess
- Hepatic abscess NOS
- Lymphogenic hepatic abscess
- Pylephlebitic hepatic abscess
- Abscess › hepatic (cholangitic) (hematogenic) (lymphogenic) (pylephlebitic)
- Abscess › liver (cholangitic) (hematogenic) (lymphogenic) (pylephlebitic) (pyogenic)
- Inflammation, inflamed, inflammatory › liver › suppurative
These two codes sit in different chapters of the Tabular List, which is usually the clearest signal that they describe different underlying processes rather than different degrees of the same one.
Excludes1 is not always absolute: where two conditions covered by the note are genuinely unrelated, CMS guidance permits reporting both. Document the reasoning rather than assuming it. More on Excludes1 vs Excludes2 · FY2027